Tax, Chennai v. Shri G.nagarajan
High Court
22 Mar 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Tax, Chennai v. Shri G.nagarajan
Date of order
22 Mar 2016
Assessment year(s)
2004-05
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Tax, Chennai v. Shri G.nagarajan, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: Therefore, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
In the High Court of Judicature at Madras
Coram :
The Honourable Mr.Justice V.RAMASUBRAMANIANand
The Honourable Mr.Justice N.KIRUBAKARAN
Tax Case Appeal No.599 of 2014
The Commissioner of IncomeTax, Chennai.
Tax, Chennai....AppellantVsShri G.Nagarajan...Respondent
APPEAL under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961against the order dated 6.9.2011 made in I.T.A.No.1142/Mds/2009on the file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'A'Bench, Chennai for the assessment year 2004-05 and against theorder dated 25.3.009 made in ITA.No.65/08-09 on the file ofCommissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) IX, Chennai-34 and againstthe order dated 31.12.2008 made in PAN/GIR.No. on thefile of Income Tax Officer, Business ward IX (1) Chennai.
For Appellant : Mr.M.Swaminathan
For Respondent : Mr.K.Sasindran
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED BY V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN,J
The tax effect of this appeal is less than the limitprescribed by Circular No.21/2015 dated 10.12.2015 issued by theCentral Board of Direct Taxes.
2. Therefore, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Thequestions are left unanswered. No costs.
Sd/- Asst.Registrar (CO)
/true copy/
RS
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
To
1. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'A' Bench, Chennai.
2. The Commissioner of Income Tax,Chennai
3. The Commissioner of Income Tax
(Appeals) IX, Chennai-34
4. The Income Tax OfficerBusiness ward IX, (1) Chennai
1 cc to Mr.K. Saisindran, Advocate, Sr. 18112TCA.No.599 of 2014VD (CO)kk 6/4
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.