Case LawHigh Court › Tax, Chennai v. Shri P.r.manickam

Tax, Chennai v. Shri P.r.manickam

High Court 12 Oct 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Tax, Chennai v. Shri P.r.manickam
Date of order
12 Oct 2018
Assessment year(s)
1986-87
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Tax, Chennai v. Shri P.r.manickam, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal.

Decision: In the light of the above, the appeal is dismissed aswithdrawn and the substantial questions of law framed are leftopen.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

In the High Court of Judicature at Madras Dated : 12.10.2018 Coram : The Honourable Mr.Justice T.S.SIVAGNANAM and The Honourable Mrs.Justice V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN Tax Case Appeal No.543 of 2013 The Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai. Tax, Chennai. ...AppellantVsShri P.R.Manickam...RespondentPrayer: APPEAL under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961against the order dated 01.3.2012 in IT(SS)A No.4/Mds/2009 onthe file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Chennai 'C' Benchfor the block period 01.4.1985 to 31.3.1995 and 01.4.1995 to29.9.1995, against the order of the Deputy Commissioner ofIncome Tax, Central Circle II(1), Chennai-34, dated 31.12.2008made in assessment year 1986-87 to 1996-97.For Appellant : Mr.M.SwaminathanFor Respondent: Mr.Ashok Pathy forM/s.Pass Associates Judgment was delivered by T.S.SIVAGNANAM,J Heard the learned counsel for the appellant. 2. This appeal by the Revenue challenges the order passed bythe Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, which decided the issue infavour of the assessee. 3. The Revenue seeks to withdraw the appeal on account oflow tax effect in terms of Circular No.3 of 2018 dated 11.7.2018issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 4. In the light of the above, the appeal is dismissed aswithdrawn and the substantial questions of law framed are leftopen. In the event the tax effect is above the threshold limitfixed in the said circular, liberty is granted to the Revenue tomake a mention to this Court to restore the appeal to be heardand decided on merits. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS V) //True Copy// Sub Assistant RegistrarTo1.The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai 'C' Bench.2.The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax,Central Circle II(1), Chennai-34.3.The Section Officer,VR Section,High Court, Madras.+1cc to Mr.M.Swaminathan, Advocate sr.no.70929TCA.No.543 of 2013mr(co)nr 09/11/2018
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan