Case LawHigh Court › Tax City-3 v. M/S Standard Industries Lt...

Tax City-3 v. M/S Standard Industries Ltd

High Court 04 Sep 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Tax City-3 v. M/S Standard Industries Ltd
Date of order
04 Sep 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Tax City-3 v. M/S Standard Industries Ltd, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. Income Tax Appeal No. 721 of 2002 The Commissioner of Income Tax City-3 ..Appellant vs. M/s Standard Industries Ltd. ..Respondent’’ Mr.Vimal Gupta for appellant. Ms.Vasanti B.Patel for respondent. CORAM: Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &S.J.KATHAWALLA JJ. 4th September,2008 CORAM: Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.KATHAWALLA JJ. 4th September,2008 P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the appellant and the learned Counsel appearing for the respondent. 2. The above appeal was admitted on 9th September, 2004 on the following substantial question of law. "Whether another facts and in the circumstances of the case the Tribunal was justified in law in holding that interest under section 217 of the Income Tax Act is not leviable when income is computed under section 115-J of the Income Tax Act? 3. Both the learned Counsel for the appellant and -2- respondent categorically state that the Tribunal had relied on the judgment of Karnataka High Court in the case of Kwality Biscuits Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax reported in 243 ITR 519 which judgment was carried in appeal by way of Special Leave Petition before the Hon’ble Supreme Court and the Hon’ble Supreme Court in its judgment in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax. Vs. Kwality Biscuits Ltd. reported in 284 ITR 434 (SC) has upheld the view taken by Karnataka High Court. 4. In the light of the principles laid down in the said judgment we answer the aforesaid question of law in negative in favour of the assessee and against the revenue. (S.J.KATHAWALLA J.) (Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.) (S.J.KATHAWALLA J.) (Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan