Case LawHigh Court › Tax - Delhi-2 v. Bechtel India Ltd

Tax - Delhi-2 v. Bechtel India Ltd

High Court 12 May 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Tax - Delhi-2 v. Bechtel India Ltd
Date of order
12 May 2016
Assessment year(s)
2005-06
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Tax - Delhi-2 v. Bechtel India Ltd, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal.

Decision: Consequently, the appeals are dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 1. + ITA 283/2016 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - DELHI-2 ..... Appellant Through: Mr P. Roy Chaudhuri, Senior Standing counsel. versus BECHTEL INDIA LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr Piyush Kaushik, Advocate. AND 21. + ITA 303/2016 PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -DELHI-2 ..... Appellant Through: Mr P. Roy Chaudhuri, Senior Standing counsel. versus BECHTEL INDIA LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr Piyush Kaushik, Advocate. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R% 12.05.2016 % 1. These two appeals by the Revenue are directed against the two separate orders dated 20[th] November, 2015 passed by the Income Tax Appellate ITA Nos.283 & 303 of 2016 Page 1 of 2 Tribunal (‘ITAT’) in ITA No.1476/Del/2015 for the Assessment Year (‘AY’) 2004-05 and ITA No.1477/Del/2015 for the AY 2005-06. 2. The two questions sought to be urged by the Revenue concern the exclusion and inclusion of companies in the final list of comparables for determining the Arm’s Length Price of the international transactions undertaken by the Assessee. As far as this issue is concerned, the discussion in the impugned order of the ITAT of the reasons is exhaustive and has turned purely on facts. No substantial question of law arises as regards the said issue. Consequently, the appeals are dismissed. S.MURALIDHAR, J MAY 12, 2016 MK VIBHU BAKHRU, J ITA Nos.283 & 303 of 2016 Page 2 of 2
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan