Case LawHigh Court › Tax I, Chandigarh v. M/S Rana Polycot Li...

Tax I, Chandigarh v. M/S Rana Polycot Limited

High Court 28 Aug 2014 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Tax I, Chandigarh v. M/S Rana Polycot Limited
Date of order
28 Aug 2014
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Tax I, Chandigarh v. M/S Rana Polycot Limited, the High Court (2014) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH ITA No.167 of 2008 (O&M)Date of decision: 28.8.2014 The Commissioner of Income Tax I, Chandigarh Vs, ..-.-- Appe M/s Rana Sugar Limited .....Responde CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTALHON’BLE MR. JUSTICE FATEH DEEP SINGH Present: Ms. Urvashi Dhugga,Advocatefor the appellant.Mr. Ravi Shankar, Advocate for the respondent. Ajay Kumar Mittal,J. For orders, see ITA No.163 of 2008 (Commissioner ofIncome Tax I, Chandigarh vs. M/s Rana Polycot Limited) (Ajay Kumar Mittal)Judge August 28, 2014 (Fateh Deep Singh)Judge “gS
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan