Tax-I, Kolhapur v. Rajarambapu Patil Sahakari
High Court
10 Jul 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Tax-I, Kolhapur v. Rajarambapu Patil Sahakari
Date of order
10 Jul 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Tax-I, Kolhapur v. Rajarambapu Patil Sahakari, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Decision: Following the Judgment, the Appeal is accordingly dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 529 OF 2006
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 529 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income
Tax-I, Kolhapur ..Appellant
versus
Rajarambapu Patil Sahakari
Sakhar Karkhana Ltd., Sangli ..Respondent
Mr. Vimal Gupta for the Appellant.
Mr. S. N. Inamdar for the Respondent.
CORAM : BILAL NAZKI &A.A. KUMBHAKONI, JJ.
CORAM : BILAL NAZKI &
A.A. KUMBHAKONI, JJ.
DATE : 10TH JULY, 2008.
P.C.
P.C.
. It is submitted at the bar that the
questions raised in this Appeal are covered by the Judgment of this Court reported in [2008] 301 ITR191 (Bom) Commissioner of Income-Tax vs. ManjaraShetkari Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. Following
the Judgment, the Appeal is accordingly dismissed.
( BILAL NAZKI, J. )
(A. A. KUMBHAKONI, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue