In Tax-I, Nashik v. Kadwa Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Decision: In view thereof we dismiss the above appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
O.O.C.J.
Income Tax Appeal No.1584 of 2007
The Commissioner of Income
Tax-I, Nashik ..Appellant
vs.
Kadwa Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana
Ltd. at Rajaramnagar ..Respondent
Mr.Vimal Gupta i/b Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for appellant.
None for respondent.
CORAM: Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &S.J.KATHAWALLA JJ. 12th August, 2008
CORAM: Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
S.J.KATHAWALLA JJ.
12th August, 2008
P.C.
P.C.
1. Heard the learned Counsel Mr.Gupta appearing for the
appellant. None appears for the respondent.
2. The learned Counsel Mr.Gupta fairly states that the
question of law raised in the above appeal has already
been decided against the revenue and in favour of the
assessee by this Court in the matter of Commissioner of
Income Tax Vs. Manjara Shetkari Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana
Ltd. reported in (2008) 301 ITR 191 (Bom). In view
thereof we dismiss the above appeal.
(S.J.KATHAWALLA J.) (Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.)
(S.J.KATHAWALLA J.) (Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.