Tax - International Taxation -1 v. Bechtel Power Corporation
High Court
12 Aug 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Tax - International Taxation -1 v. Bechtel Power Corporation
Date of order
12 Aug 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Tax - International Taxation -1 v. Bechtel Power Corporation, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
$~84 & 85
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ITA 296/2025, CM APPL. 49283/2025 & CM APPL. 49284/2025THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME
TAX - INTERNATIONAL TAXATION -1
.....AppellantThrough:Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, SSC with Mr.AnantMann,JSC&Ms.AditiSabharwal, Advocate.
versus
BECHTEL POWER CORPORATION
.....Respondent
Through:None.
(85)
+ITA 297/2025, CM APPL. 49285/2025 & CM APPL. 49286/2025
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX - INTERNATIONAL TAXATION -1
.....Appellant
Through:Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, SSC with Mr.AnantMann,JSC&Ms.AditiSabharwal, Advocate.
versus
BECHTEL POWER CORPORATION
.....Respondent
Through:None.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAOHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMARO R D E R%12.08.2025
1.Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing for
This is a digitally signed order.
appellant/the Revenue fairly states as it is a case of law tax effect, thepetitions be dismissed as not pressed.petitions be dismissed as not pressed.
2.Thepresentpetitionsaredismissedasnotapplication(s) is also dismissed as infrucuous.application(s) is also dismissed as infrucuous.
pressed.Pending
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
AUGUST 12, 2025
rk
VINOD KUMAR, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.