Tax - International Taxation -1 v. Bechtel Power Corporation
High Court
12 Aug 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Tax - International Taxation -1 v. Bechtel Power Corporation
Date of order
12 Aug 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Tax - International Taxation -1 v. Bechtel Power Corporation, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~84 & 85
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ITA 296/2025, CM APPL. 49283/2025 & CM APPL. 49284/2025THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME
TAX - INTERNATIONAL TAXATION -1
.....AppellantThrough:Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, SSC with Mr.AnantMann,JSC&Ms.AditiSabharwal, Advocate.
versus
BECHTEL POWER CORPORATION
.....Respondent
Through:None.
(85)
+ITA 297/2025, CM APPL. 49285/2025 & CM APPL. 49286/2025
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOMETAX - INTERNATIONAL TAXATION -1
.....Appellant
Through:Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, SSC with Mr.AnantMann,JSC&Ms.AditiSabharwal, Advocate.
versus
BECHTEL POWER CORPORATION
.....Respondent
Through:None.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAOHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMARO R D E R%12.08.2025
1.Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing for
This is a digitally signed order.
appellant/the Revenue fairly states as it is a case of law tax effect, thepetitions be dismissed as not pressed.petitions be dismissed as not pressed.
2.Thepresentpetitionsaredismissedapplication(s) is also dismissed as infrucuous.application(s) is also dismissed as infrucuous.
asnot
pressed.Pending
V. KAMESWAR RAO, J
AUGUST 12, 2025
rk
VINOD KUMAR, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.