Tax, Ludhiana It v. Ajay Kumar Mittal
High Court
20 Oct 2015 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Tax, Ludhiana It v. Ajay Kumar Mittal
Date of order
20 Oct 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Tax, Ludhiana It v. Ajay Kumar Mittal, the High Court (2015) allowed the appeal.
Issue: Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?2.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH
ITA No.899 of 2010Date of decision: 20.10.2015
Commissioner of Income Tax, Ludhiana II
.....- Appe
Smt. Savita Goyal, Proprietor . M/s Shree Sudharma Industries. GIRoad, Khanna
....mesponden
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTALHON’ BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN
1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?3. Whether the judgment should be reported 1n the Digest?
Present: Mr. Zora Singh Klar, Advocate, Advocate for the appellant-TEVENUE.Mr. S.K.Mukhi, Advocate for the respondent-assessee.
Ajay Kumar Mittal,J,
For orders, see ITA No.764 of 2008|(Commissioner ofIncome
Tax, Ludhiana IT vs. Smt.Savita Goyal, Prop. Shree Sudharma Inds., GTRoad, Khanna).
(Ajay Kumar Mittal)
Judge
October 20, 2015‘gs!
(Ramendra Jain)Judge|
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue