In Tax, Mumbai v. M/S W.h. Brady & Co. Ltd, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1694 OF 2006
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG.) NO.852 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income- ... ... AppellantTax, MumbaiVs.M/s W.H. Brady & Co. Ltd.... ... RespondentsMumbai.Mr. B.M. Chatterji, Mrs. P.P. Bhosale andMr. P.S. Sahadevan for Appellant.Ms. Aasifa Khan with Mr. Atul K. Jasani forRespondents.
.We have heard the learned counsel for theparties. There is a delay of 50 days.Considering the cause shown, delay condonedsubject to appellant’s paying to the respondentcosts quantified at Rs.2,500/- as conditionprecedent within 12 weeks from today. Office toregister the Appeal.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue