In Tax Recovery Officer v. Lilu Ram And Others, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal.
Issue: Walia)Judge 1.Whether speaking/reasonedYes/No.2.Whether reportable|Yes/No.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
(212)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH
CR No.2032 of 2017 (O&M)Date of decision: 15.07.2019
Tax Recovery Officer
—__ Petitioner
Versus
Lilu Ram and others
.... Respondent
Before:Hon’ble Mr. Justice B.S. Walia.
Present ;Mr. Vaibhav Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.
None for the respondents.
FR
B.S. WALIA, J. (QRAL)
For order, see detailed reasons recorded in a separate
order of even date passed in CR No.8244 of 2016 titled as‘Ta
Recovery Officer v. Sham Lal and others
15.07.2019.
amit
(B.S. Walia)Judge
1.Whether speaking/reasonedYes/No.2.Whether reportable|Yes/No.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.