Tax (Tds) Chandigarh v. The Accounts Officer, M/S Dakshin Haryanabili Vitran Nigam Limited, Panchkula
High Court
06 Nov 2015 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Tax (Tds) Chandigarh v. The Accounts Officer, M/S Dakshin Haryanabili Vitran Nigam Limited, Panchkula
Date of order
06 Nov 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Tax (Tds) Chandigarh v. The Accounts Officer, M/S Dakshin Haryanabili Vitran Nigam Limited, Panchkula, the High Court (2015) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH
ITA No.203 of 2011 (O&M)Date of decision:6.11.2015
Commissioner of Income Tax (IDS) Chandigarh
.....- Appe
Vs,
The Principal Officer (CAO), M/s Uttar Haryana Billi Vitran NigamLimited, Panchkula
....mesponden
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICEK AJAY KUMAR MITTAHON BLE MR. JUSTICE HARI PAL VERMA
Present:Mr. Yogesh Putney, Advocate for the appellant-revenue.Mr. Saurabh Kapoor, Advocate for the assessee.
Ajay Kumar Mittal,J,
For orders, see ITA No.201 of 2011(Commissioner ofIncome
Tax (TDS) Chandigarh vs. The Accounts Officer, M/s Dakshin Haryanabili Vitran Nigam Limited, Panchkula).
(Ajay Kumar Mittal)Judge
November 06, 2015.4 g
(Har! Pal Verma)Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue