In Tax v. Andrew Telecommunication Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2017) allowed the appeal.
Decision: Sufficient cause is made out.Subject to the removal of the office objections within a period of twoweeks from today, the Civil Revision Application is allowed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1
Amrut
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.36 OF 2017
The Principal Commissioner of Income Panaji Goa.
Tax,
VersusAndrew Telecommunication Pvt. Ltd.
…. Applicant
…. Respondent
Ms. A. Razaq, Advocate for the Applicant.
Ms. Priyanka Kamat, Advocate for the respondent.
Coram : N.M. Jamdar, J.
Date : 24 November 2017.
P.C.:
Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
2.Perused the application. Sufficient cause is made out.Subject to the removal of the office objections within a period of twoweeks from today, the Civil Revision Application is allowed. Theorder by the learned Registrar ( Judicial ) dismissing the Tax Appeal isset aside and the appeal stands restored to file. If the office objectionsare not removed within a period of two weeks as above then the orderpassed by the learned Registrar dismissing the appeal will standrevived.
N.M. Jamdar, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue