Case LawHigh Court › Tax v. M/.S Kehmi Filaments Ltd

Tax v. M/.S Kehmi Filaments Ltd

High Court 21 Jul 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Tax v. M/.S Kehmi Filaments Ltd
Date of order
21 Jul 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Tax v. M/.S Kehmi Filaments Ltd, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.

Issue: In the present appeal the following substantial question of law has been raised. "Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Hon’ble ITAT was justified in holding that the activities of texturising and twisting the yarn is a process of manufacturing of articles or things with...

Decision: The income tax appeal is disposed of accordingly.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION Income Tax Appeal No. 112 of 2002 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant Vs. M/.s Kehmi Filaments Ltd. ..Respondents Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for appellant. Mr.S.S.Shetty for respondents. CORAM: Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.KATHAWALLA JJ. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the appellant and the learned Counsel appearing for the respondents. In the present appeal the following substantial question of law has been raised. "Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Hon’ble ITAT was justified in holding that the activities of texturising and twisting the yarn is a process of manufacturing of articles or things within the meaning of section 80IA of the Income Tax Act, 1961?" 2. Both the learned Counsel state that the very same question was considered by this Court in Income Tax Appeal No.1393 of 2000 decided by the Division Bench on 27th February, 2008 in the matter of the Commissioner of Income Tax, Bombay City-IV, Bombay Vs. M/s Emptee Poly-Yarn Pvt.Ltd. wherein this Court has clearly answered the said question in favour of the assessee and against the revenue. Accordingly, in the present appeal also the question of law has been answered in favour of the assessee and against the revenue for the same reasons. The income tax appeal is disposed of accordingly. (S.J.KATHAWALLA J.) (DR.S.RADHAAKRISHNAN J.) (S.J.KATHAWALLA J.) (DR.S.RADHAAKRISHNAN J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan