Case LawHigh Court › Tax v. M/S Lazer Detergents Pvt.ltd

Tax v. M/S Lazer Detergents Pvt.ltd

High Court 25 Aug 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Tax v. M/S Lazer Detergents Pvt.ltd
Date of order
25 Aug 2008
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Tax v. M/S Lazer Detergents Pvt.ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal.

Issue: Perused the question of law which read as under: "Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the ITAT was justified in directing for deduction of Rs.23,28,198/- as service charges paid by the assessee to M/s Almanac textiles Ltd. although no evidence was produced to prima...

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. Income Tax Appeal No. 185 of 2002 The Commissioner of Income Tax ..Appellant vs. M/s Lazer Detergents Pvt.Ltd. ..Respondent Mr.Vimal Gupta for appellant. Mr.J.D.Mistri i/b Mr.Raj Darak for respondent. CORAM: Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &S.J.KATHAWALLA JJ. 25th August, 2008 CORAM: Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.KATHAWALLA JJ. P.C. P.C. 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the appellant and the learned Counsel for the respondent. 2. Perused the question of law which read as under: "Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the ITAT was justified in directing for deduction of Rs.23,28,198/- as service charges paid by the assessee to M/s Almanac textiles Ltd. although no evidence was produced to prima facie establish the claim of rendering of services by the recipient while the onus lay on the assessee to establish the claim". -2- 3. We have perused the Tribunal’s order dated 9th July, 2000. From the order it is very clear that it is only finding of fact. There is no substantial question of law involved in the above. Appeal is devoid of any merits. The same is dismissed. (S.J.KATHAWALLA J.) (Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.) (S.J.KATHAWALLA J.) (Dr.S.RADHAKRISHNAN J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan