In Tax v. M/S.bamleshwarimandirsamiti, Dongargarh, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1
'w
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Coram: HON'BLE MR.T.P.SHARMA &HON'BLE MR.I.S.UBOWEJA, JJ.
Review Petition No.132 of 2013
CommissionerofIncomeRaipur
ADDlicant
Tax,
Versus
M/s.BamleshwariMandirSamiti, Dongargarh
ReSDOhdent
Trust
(Application for review of theorder dated 2.5.2007)
Mr.Anand Daclft^fcoaaftfthSlPtent.
ORDER<i5g2-2<?14)
B?'
'RJ
i't5^'.;^^.-"i^.
1.lis review petition^tlS Bg|)^f^ •-..:'.:^.
.;^^.-"i^.1^-ISas prayed[for][ revie^isT][ the][ onJer]
^f^ •-..:'.: •-..:'.:^.
dated 2.5.2007 passed Mfli P8wiSJ&n'.?i:Ssi..?'1.S'-i^ W.i"'f Bench inlncome Tax ReferenceN6.14of2001.
SMMt ?il2. Inthelight of para 5i^^^ls4er,present review petitionisnotmaintairiable and disn|i^je{l|^li^c)l'fli^intainable reserving liberty to theapplicanftofileappropria'BRgti&BiSffoorderastocosts.'
Sd/-.'LP.SharmaJudge
.<Inid®r':Suig)KJudge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.