Case LawHigh Court › Tax v. M/S.merind Ltd

Tax v. M/S.merind Ltd

High Court 01 Aug 2006 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Tax v. M/S.merind Ltd
Date of order
01 Aug 2006
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Tax v. M/S.merind Ltd, the High Court (2006) decided the matter.

Issue: The question sought to be raised in this matter is whether the Appellate Tribunal erred in holding that the expenditure incurred by the assessee of Rs.1,66,910/- on corporate club membership fees could be considered as Revenue expenditure.

Decision: Appeal is, therefore, rejected.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY O.O.C.J. Income Tax Appeal (L) No.254 of 2003 The Commissioner of Income Tax. .. .. Appellant vs. M/s.Merind Ltd. ..Respondent Mrs.P.P.Bhosale for appellant. Mr.Shoaib Khan i/by Crawford Baley for res. ----- CORAM : H.L. GOKHALE & V.R. KINGAONKAR, JJ. DATED : 1st August 2006 P.C. : P.C. : 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the parties. 2. The question sought to be raised in this matter is whether the Appellate Tribunal erred in holding that the expenditure incurred by the assessee of Rs.1,66,910/- on corporate club membership fees could be considered as Revenue expenditure. This question is covered against the department in the case of Otis Elevator Co.(India)Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Income Tax reported in195 ITR 680. Since the amount involved in this matter is less than Rs.Two Lakhs and since there is a circular of CBDT not to prosecute such matters further unless there is a very important question of law involved, we do not entertain this Appeal. No such important question of law is involved in this matter. Appeal is, therefore, rejected. (H.L. GOKHALE, J.) (H.L. GOKHALE, J.) -2- (V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.) (V.R. KINGAONKAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan