Tax v. Nandanam Constructions[[1
High Court
06 Mar 2012 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Tax v. Nandanam Constructions[[1
Date of order
06 Mar 2012
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Tax v. Nandanam Constructions[[1, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI MADAN B.LOKURANDHONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
R.C. NO.96 OF 1999
DATED 6TH MARCH, 2012
Between
Commissioner of Income-Tax,A.P.-I, Hyderabad.
…Applicant
AND
M/s.United Housing Corporation,Secunderabad.
…Respondent
HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI MADAN B.LOKURANDHONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
R.C. NO.96 OF 1999
ORDER: (PER HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI MADAN B.LOKUR)
Learned counsel for the Revenue frankly says that thequestions raised in this Referred Case are squarely covered by adecision rendered by this Court in COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-
TAX v. NANDANAM CONSTRUCTIONS[[1]].
2. Following the same, the questions raised in this Referred Caseare required to be answered in the affirmative, in favour of theassessee and against the Revenue.
3. Accordingly, this Referred Case is dismissed.
( MADAN B.LOKUR, CJ )
( SANJAY KUMAR, J )
8 MARCH, 2012.
VGSR
[1] (1996) 222 ITR 737 (AP) (1996) 222 ITR 737 (AP)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue