Case LawHigh Court › Tax v. New Skies Satellite Bv (2016) 382...

Tax v. New Skies Satellite Bv (2016) 382 Itr 114

High Court 28 Sep 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Tax v. New Skies Satellite Bv (2016) 382 Itr 114
Date of order
28 Sep 2022
Assessment year(s)
2016-17
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Tax v. New Skies Satellite Bv (2016) 382 Itr 114, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal.

Decision: 7.Accordingly, no substantial question of law arises for consideration inthe present appeal and the same is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

$~28 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ITA 375/2022 THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - INTERNATIONALTAXATION 2 DELHI..... AppellantThrough:Mr.RuchirBhatia,Sr.StandingCounsel for Revenue.versus NEW SKIES SATELLITE BV ..... Respondent Through:Ms. Ananya Kapoor & Mr. SalilKapoor, Advocates. %Date of Decision: 28[th]September, 2022 CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHANHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA J U D G M E N T MANMOHAN, J (Oral): 1.Present income tax appeal has been filed challenging the impugnedorder dated 30[th]September, 2019 passed by the Income Tax AppellateTribunal (‘ITAT’) in ITA No. 5054/Del./2019 for Assessment Year 2016-17. 2.Learned counsel for the Appellant states that the ITAT has erred inholding that receipts of the assessee, earned from providing satellitetransmission services do not fall within the term 'royalty' under the India-Netherlands DTAA even after insertion of Explanation 5 and 6 to section9(1)(vi) of the Income Tax Act,1961 by Finance Act, 2012 and withoutconsidering the position of India on OECD commentary on this issue. 3.Admittedly, the question of law urged in the present appeal is covered ITA 375/2022 Page 1 of 2 by the decision of this Court in assessee’s own case in Director of Income Tax vs. New Skies Satellite BV (2016) 382 ITR 114. 4.Learned counsel for the Appellant states that the Revenue has notaccepted the aforesaid decision and has preferred a Special Leave Petitionagainst the same being Civil Appeal No.1380/2016. 5.Though the judgment of this Court has been challenged and ispending adjudication before the Supreme Court, yet there is no stay of thesaid judgment till date. 6.Consequently, in view of the judgments passed by the Supreme Courtin Kunhayammed and Others vs. State of Kerala and Another, (2000) 6SCC 359 and Shree Chamundi Mopeds Ltd. Vs. Church of South IndiaTrust Association CSI Cinod Secretariat, Madras (1992) 3 SCC 1, thepresent appeal is covered by the judgment passed by the learned predecessorDivision Bench in New Skies Satellite BV (supra). 7.Accordingly, no substantial question of law arises for consideration inthe present appeal and the same is dismissed. 8.However, it is clarified that the order passed in the present appealshall abide by the final decision of the Supreme Court in the aforesaid CivilAppeal. MANMOHAN, J SEPTEMBER 28, 2022/msh MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J ITA 375/2022
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan