Tax v. New Skies Satellite Bv (2016) 382 Itr 114
High Court
28 Sep 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Tax v. New Skies Satellite Bv (2016) 382 Itr 114
Date of order
28 Sep 2022
Assessment year(s)
2016-17
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Tax v. New Skies Satellite Bv (2016) 382 Itr 114, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal.
Decision: 7.Accordingly, no substantial question of law arises for consideration inthe present appeal and the same is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
$~28
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ITA 375/2022
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - INTERNATIONALTAXATION 2 DELHI..... AppellantThrough:Mr.RuchirBhatia,Sr.StandingCounsel for Revenue.versus
NEW SKIES SATELLITE BV
..... Respondent
Through:Ms. Ananya Kapoor & Mr. SalilKapoor, Advocates.
%Date of Decision: 28[th]September, 2022
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHANHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
J U D G M E N T
MANMOHAN, J (Oral):
1.Present income tax appeal has been filed challenging the impugnedorder dated 30[th]September, 2019 passed by the Income Tax AppellateTribunal (‘ITAT’) in ITA No. 5054/Del./2019 for Assessment Year 2016-17.
2.Learned counsel for the Appellant states that the ITAT has erred inholding that receipts of the assessee, earned from providing satellitetransmission services do not fall within the term 'royalty' under the India-Netherlands DTAA even after insertion of Explanation 5 and 6 to section9(1)(vi) of the Income Tax Act,1961 by Finance Act, 2012 and withoutconsidering the position of India on OECD commentary on this issue.
3.Admittedly, the question of law urged in the present appeal is covered
ITA 375/2022
Page 1 of 2
by the decision of this Court in assessee’s own case in Director of Income
Tax vs. New Skies Satellite BV (2016) 382 ITR 114.
4.Learned counsel for the Appellant states that the Revenue has notaccepted the aforesaid decision and has preferred a Special Leave Petitionagainst the same being Civil Appeal No.1380/2016.
5.Though the judgment of this Court has been challenged and ispending adjudication before the Supreme Court, yet there is no stay of thesaid judgment till date.
6.Consequently, in view of the judgments passed by the Supreme Courtin Kunhayammed and Others vs. State of Kerala and Another, (2000) 6SCC 359 and Shree Chamundi Mopeds Ltd. Vs. Church of South IndiaTrust Association CSI Cinod Secretariat, Madras (1992) 3 SCC 1, thepresent appeal is covered by the judgment passed by the learned predecessorDivision Bench in New Skies Satellite BV (supra).
7.Accordingly, no substantial question of law arises for consideration inthe present appeal and the same is dismissed.
8.However, it is clarified that the order passed in the present appealshall abide by the final decision of the Supreme Court in the aforesaid CivilAppeal.
MANMOHAN, J
SEPTEMBER 28, 2022/msh
MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J
ITA 375/2022
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.