Tax v. Pepsi Foods Ltd.,1 And Therefore, These Appeals Could Be Disposed
High Court
21 Feb 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Tax v. Pepsi Foods Ltd.,1 And Therefore, These Appeals Could Be Disposed
Date of order
21 Feb 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Tax v. Pepsi Foods Ltd.,1 And Therefore, These Appeals Could Be Disposed, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Digitallysigned byMEERAMEERAMAHESHMAHESHJADHAVJADHAVDate:2022.02.2215:55:19+0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.3039 OF 2019
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-10 Mumbai
V/s.Procter & Gamble Hygiene & Healthcare Ltd.
….Appellant
…Respondent
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.929 OF 2019
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-10 Mumbai
V/s. Procter & Gamble Hygiene & Healthcare Ltd.
….Appellant
…Respondent
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.397 OF 2021
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-10 Mumbai
V/s. Procter & Gamble Hygiene & Healthcare Ltd.
….Appellant
…Respondent
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2110 OF 2019
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-10 Mumbai
V/s. Prothious Engineering Services Pvt. Ltd.
….Appellant
…Respondent
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.367 OF 2021
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-10 Mumbai
V/s. Prothious Engineering Services Pvt. Ltd.
….Appellant
…Respondent
----
Mr. Akhileshwar Sharma for Appellant in all AppealsMr. B. S. Yewale i/b Rajesh Shah & Co. for Respondent in ITXA/3039/2019Mr. Harsh Kapadia for Respondent in ITXA/929/2019 & ITXA/397/2021Mr. Abhishek Tilak for Respondent in ITXA/2110/2019 & ITXA/367/2021
----
P.C. :
CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM &N.J. JAMADAR, JJ
DATED : 21[st] FEBRUARY 2022
1Not on board. Upon mentioning taken on board.
2Mr. Sharma states that the proposed substantial questions of law are
covered by judgment of the Apex Court in Deputy Commissioner of Income
Tax Vs. Pepsi Foods Ltd.,1 and therefore, these appeals could be disposed.
3Accordingly, appeals stand disposed.
(N. J. JAMADAR, J.)
(K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue