Tax v. Sudarshan Chemicals Industries Ltd., 245
High Court
22 Sep 2004 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Tax v. Sudarshan Chemicals Industries Ltd., 245
Date of order
22 Sep 2004
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Tax v. Sudarshan Chemicals Industries Ltd., 245, the High Court (2004) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
O.O.C.J.
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.820 OF 2002
The Commissioner of Income Tax,Mumbai city X, Mumbai
v/s.
M/s. Godrej and Boyce Mfg.Co.Ltd. .. Respondent
.. Appellant
Mr.R.Asokan i/by Mr.K.B.Rao for appellant.
P.C.
Heard.
CORAM: R.M.LODHA ANDJ.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED:22ndSeptember, 2004
2. In the memorandum of appeal, two questions have
been proposed which read thus-
Tax v. Sudarshan Chemicals Industries Ltd., 245
3. The learned counsel for the revenue submitsthat the said judgment is under chalenge before theSupreme Court.
4. Even if that be so, in so far as we areconcerned, the issue stands concluded by theDivision Bench Judgement of this court.5. In so far as question (b) is concerned, thecontroversy stands concluded by the judgment of theSupreme Court in the case of Commissioner of Income
Tax v. Indo Nippon Chemicals Co.Ltd., 261 ITR 275.
6. No substantial question of law arises in this
appeal. Dismissed in limine.
(R.M.LODHA, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue