Tax v. Vockanardt Pvt.ltd., 215 Itr, 793 For
High Court
14 Oct 2004 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Tax v. Vockanardt Pvt.ltd., 215 Itr, 793 For
Date of order
14 Oct 2004
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Tax v. Vockanardt Pvt.ltd., 215 Itr, 793 For, the High Court (2004) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
O.O.C.J.
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.186 OF 2003
Maharashtra State Textile CorporationLtd.v/s.
.. Appellant
Deputy Commissioner of Income tax,Spl. Range 15, Mumbai & anr... Respondents
Mr.A.K.Jesani i/by M/s.Divekar & Co. forappellant.
Mr.R.V.Desai, senior counsel with Ms.S.V.Bharuchai/by Mr.P.Kapur for respondent.
CORAM: R.M.LODHA AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED:14thOctober, 2004
P.C.
Heard Mr.A.K.Jesani, the learned counsel for
the appellant and Mr.R.V.Desai, the learned senior
counsel for the respondent.
2. Taking overall aspects of the matter intoconsideration, we do not find any justifiableground in referring the Division Bench judgment ofthis court in the case of Commissioner of Income
Tax v. Vockanardt Pvt.Ltd., 215 ITR, 793 for
reconsideration to the larger bench.
3. It is not in dispute that the controversyraised in this appeal is concluded against theappellant by the Division Bench judgment of this
4. Dismissed in limine.
(R.M.LODHA, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue