Case LawHigh Court › Taxation v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd....

Taxation v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.,:[2011] 16 Taxmann.com 141 (Kar.), This Appeal Stands Dismissed

High Court 25 Oct 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Taxation v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.,:[2011] 16 Taxmann.com 141 (Kar.), This Appeal Stands Dismissed
Date of order
25 Oct 2018
Assessment year(s)
2008-2009
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Taxation v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.,:[2011] 16 Taxmann.com 141 (Kar.), This Appeal Stands Dismissed, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal.

Decision: Ltd.,:[2011] 16 taxmann.com 141 (Kar.), this appeal stands dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25 DAY OF OCTOBER, 2018 PRESENT HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT I.T.A. No.228 OF 2016 BETWEEN: INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES INDIA PRIVATE. LTD., 3 FLOOR, BLOCK 1, KALYANI PLATINA SURVEY NO. 6 & 24, KUNDALAHALLI VILLAGE K. R. PURAM HOBLI BANGALORE – 560 066. ... APPELLANT (BY SRI. ANKUR PAI, ADVOCATE FOR SRI.K. R. VASUDEVAN, ADVOCATE ) AND: ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 11(4), BANGALORE. … RESPONDENT THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED :06/11/2015 PASSED IN IT(TP)A NO.1670/BANG/2012, ANNEXURE-E FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2008-2009 PRAYING TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW AS STATED ABOVE AND ANSWER THE SAME IN FAVOUR OF THE APPELLANT. TO ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE FINDINGS TO THE EXTENT AGAINST THE APPELLANT IN THE ORDER PASSED BY THE HON'BLE TRIBUNAL IN IT(TP)A NO.1670/BANG/2012 DATED: 06/11/2015 ANNEXURE-E. THIS ITA COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY CHIEF JUSTICE DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellant frankly submits that the substantial questions of law as proposed in this matter stands answered against the petitioner. Taking note of the submissions so made and following the decision in Commissioner of Income-tax, International Taxation Vs. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.,:[2011] 16 taxmann.com 141 (Kar.), this appeal stands dismissed. Sd/- CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- JUDGE NG* CT: SK
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan