Case LawHigh Court › Taxc v. Income Tax Officer Circle - 1(1)...

Taxc v. Income Tax Officer Circle - 1(1) Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

High Court 07 Apr 2025 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · cghccisdb
Parties
Taxc v. Income Tax Officer Circle - 1(1) Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
Date of order
07 Apr 2025
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Taxc v. Income Tax Officer Circle - 1(1) Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, the High Court (2025) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Accordingly, the Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

2025:CGHC:16254-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR TAXC No. 3 of 2024 1 - Kunj Bihari Agrawal Son Of Late Shri Bhagirath Prasad Agrawal Aged About 57 Years Resident Of C1-C2, Hig 17, M.P. Nagar, Niharika, Korba, Proprietor Of The Firm M/s British (I) Trading Co. With Office Address - Commercial Complex, T.P. Nagar, Korba, Chhattisgarh. ... Appellant versus 1 - Income Tax Officer Circle - 1(1) Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) Hon'ble Shri Sanjay K. Agrawal &Hon'ble Shri Deepak Kumar Tiwari, JJ Order on Board (07/04/2025) 1. Perused IA No.4/2025, application for withdrawal of the case. Digitallysigned byKRISHNAKRISHNAKUMARKUMARBARVEBARVEDate:2025.04.0811:09:33+0530 2. It is stated in the application that during the pendency of the matter, the appellant has filed an application under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024 and thereafter the Principal Commissioner of the Income appellant has filed an application under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024 and thereafter the Principal Commissioner of the Income Barve Tax Department has determined the balance amount payable under the Scheme, which was duly paid by the appellant. Therefore, the appellant seeks to withdraw the present appeal. 3. Prayer made by the appellant is allowed and the appellant is permitted to withdraw the present Appeal. 4. Accordingly, the Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) (Deepak Kumar Tiwari) Judge Judge
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan