Case LawHigh Court › Taxc v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1), A...

Taxc v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1), Aaykar Bhawan, Civil Lines,Raipur, Chhattisgarh

High Court 08 May 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cghccisdb
Parties
Taxc v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1), Aaykar Bhawan, Civil Lines,Raipur, Chhattisgarh
Date of order
08 May 2025
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Taxc v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1), Aaykar Bhawan, Civil Lines,Raipur, Chhattisgarh, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

2025:CGHC:21571-DB NAFR PRIYANKAVERMAHIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPURDigitally signed byPRIYANKA VERMADate: 2025.05.1310:42:47 +0530TAXC No. 90 of 2025 TAXC No. 90 of 2025 Chetan Sahu S/o Shri Budh Ram Sahu Aged About 38 Years R/oZora Para, Near Yadav Kirana Store, Raipur, Chhattisgarh- 492001,Pan- BRWPS3657RChetan Sahu S/o Shri Budh Ram Sahu Aged About 38 Years R/oZora Para, Near Yadav Kirana Store, Raipur, Chhattisgarh- 492001,Pan- ... Appellant versus Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1), Aaykar Bhawan, Civil Lines,Raipur, Chhattisgarh- 492001Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1), Aaykar Bhawan, Civil Lines,Raipur, Chhattisgarh- 492001 ... Respondent For Appellant For Respondent :Mr. Nikhilesh Begani, AdvocateMr. Nikhilesh Begani, Advocate :Mr. Ajay Kumrani, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. Amit Chaudhari, AdvocateMr. Ajay Kumrani, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. Amit Chaudhari, Advocate DIVISION BENCH Hon'ble Shri Sanjay K. Agrawal & Hon'ble Shri Deepak Kumar Tiwari, JJ.Order on Board 09.05.2025 Sanjay K. Agrawal, J. 1. At the very outset, Mr. Nikhilesh Begani submits that the appellant wants to file an application under Section 254 of the Income Tax Act to rectify the order in question as grounds No.1, 2 & 3 have not been decided. 2. The aforesaid prayer is not opposed by learned counsel for theRevenue.Revenue. 3. In that view of the matter, learned counsel for the appellant ispermitted to withdraw the Appeal and liberty is reserved in favourof the appellant to file an application for rectification under Section254 of the Income Tax Act.permitted to withdraw the Appeal and liberty is reserved in favourof the appellant to file an application for rectification under Section254 of the Income Tax Act. 4. Accordingly, the tax case stands disposed of with the aforesaidliberty.liberty. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any view on themerits of the case.merits of the case. Sd/- Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) (Deepak Kumar Tiwari) Judge Judge Priyanka
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan