Taxc v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1), Aaykar Bhawan, Civil Lines,Raipur, Chhattisgarh
High Court
08 May 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cghccisdb
Parties
Taxc v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1), Aaykar Bhawan, Civil Lines,Raipur, Chhattisgarh
Date of order
08 May 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Taxc v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1), Aaykar Bhawan, Civil Lines,Raipur, Chhattisgarh, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
2025:CGHC:21571-DB
NAFR
PRIYANKAVERMAHIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPURDigitally signed byPRIYANKA VERMADate: 2025.05.1310:42:47 +0530TAXC No. 90 of 2025
TAXC No. 90 of 2025
Chetan Sahu S/o Shri Budh Ram Sahu Aged About 38 Years R/oZora Para, Near Yadav Kirana Store, Raipur, Chhattisgarh- 492001,Pan- BRWPS3657RChetan Sahu S/o Shri Budh Ram Sahu Aged About 38 Years R/oZora Para, Near Yadav Kirana Store, Raipur, Chhattisgarh- 492001,Pan-
... Appellant
versus
Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1), Aaykar Bhawan, Civil Lines,Raipur, Chhattisgarh- 492001Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1), Aaykar Bhawan, Civil Lines,Raipur, Chhattisgarh- 492001
... Respondent
For Appellant
For Respondent
:Mr. Nikhilesh Begani, AdvocateMr. Nikhilesh Begani, Advocate
:Mr. Ajay Kumrani, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. Amit Chaudhari, AdvocateMr. Ajay Kumrani, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. Amit Chaudhari, Advocate
DIVISION BENCH
Hon'ble Shri Sanjay K. Agrawal &
Hon'ble Shri Deepak Kumar Tiwari, JJ.Order on Board
09.05.2025
Sanjay K. Agrawal, J.
1. At the very outset, Mr. Nikhilesh Begani submits that the appellant
wants to file an application under Section 254 of the Income Tax
Act to rectify the order in question as grounds No.1, 2 & 3 have not
been decided.
2. The aforesaid prayer is not opposed by learned counsel for theRevenue.Revenue.
3. In that view of the matter, learned counsel for the appellant ispermitted to withdraw the Appeal and liberty is reserved in favourof the appellant to file an application for rectification under Section254 of the Income Tax Act.permitted to withdraw the Appeal and liberty is reserved in favourof the appellant to file an application for rectification under Section254 of the Income Tax Act.
4. Accordingly, the tax case stands disposed of with the aforesaidliberty.liberty.
5. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any view on themerits of the case.merits of the case.
Sd/-
Sd/-
(Sanjay K. Agrawal) (Deepak Kumar Tiwari) Judge Judge
Priyanka
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.