Case LawHigh Court › Taxc/13/2006 Of Income Tax Officer, Jagd...

Taxc/13/2006 Of Income Tax Officer, Jagdalpur v. Ratan Lal Narsingh Village Geedam

High Court 14 Sep 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · cghccisdb
Parties
Taxc/13/2006 Of Income Tax Officer, Jagdalpur v. Ratan Lal Narsingh Village Geedam
Date of order
14 Sep 2016
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Taxc/13/2006 Of Income Tax Officer, Jagdalpur v. Ratan Lal Narsingh Village Geedam, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHAAT BILASPURTax Case Income Tax AppeaF N^, 1'2>/2006 GARH <!^HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASBURTAXC No. 13 of 2006Income Tax Officer, Jagdalpur-—PetitionerVersusRatan Lal Narsingh Village Geedam-—RespondentFor PetitionerSrftE NaushinaAfrin Ali, Adyocate for the petitioner.For RespondentNone appears.Hon'bleShrfc.histice Pritinker DivtokerHon'btleSKii.austroe^ehandraBhushanBajpaiOrder On BdarWBVOustice Pritinker Diwaker14/09/2016 Learned counsel for the peQSBiQSSi^iMaStty submits that in view of CircularNo.21/2015 dated 10.12.2015 issuea by the Central Board of Direct Taxes, thisappeal is not tenable.The appeal is accordingly dismissed as not maintainable. Sd/-SdA ,: {-?Pritinker DiwakerJudge(Cfrandra Bhushan BajpaiJ"JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan