Case Law › High Court › Taxc/16/2007 Of Income Tax Officer v. Sh...

Taxc/16/2007 Of Income Tax Officer v. Shri Ramesh Nilamwar

High Court 01 Sep 2009 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · cghccisdb

Parties

Date of order

01 Sep 2009

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Taxc/16/2007 Of Income Tax Officer v. Shri Ramesh Nilamwar, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

XI-HC—78 mm Hi zoo mm (Wu) WW§WWmmm%aaimmHIGH COURT OF [ AT]B LASPUR‘Com:-mHon’bl‘Shri Dhirendra Mishra[&‘]Hon’b!Shri-R.N.‘Chandrakar,JJTax Cs se No.1 612007Annel‘antincome Tax Officer, Korba‘nersusResoondentShviRameshNiiamwar,BalcoNagar, KorbaTax Ca se No.18l2007Apnellant‘AssistantCommissionerofvlnccme Tax, Circle, Korbagx erSuSRespondent$hriJ.L.DewanganL.!,G.74Shivaj'inagar, KorbaSnccme[Tax]agneal under[Section][ ESQ-A][ af][ the][ income][ Tax]¥££:‘C:’:§5l{M I09I2OD9iShri SR. Rao.[ceuns‘al]for the appeuant.$ince the substantiaE questions[of][ Saw][ involved]in both[the]casesare common,i’ne sane are taken up for hearing together’iii XI-Hc—78 Wm mm (W3) E200 XI’HC——78mmm[zoo] mm (mW

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.