Case Law › High Court › Taxc/17/2006 Of Income Tax Officer Jagda...

Taxc/17/2006 Of Income Tax Officer Jagdalpur v. Surendra Kumar Kataria Propritor

High Court 03 Jul 2009 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · cghccisdb

Parties

Date of order

03 Jul 2009

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Taxc/17/2006 Of Income Tax Officer Jagdalpur v. Surendra Kumar Kataria Propritor, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

Section 5 case law →

The order — as passed by the High Court

Xi-HC—78 ;; '^3'^;. g'Tli+i'iS. r<si'11<-LP',,-T^.^...^^...^o.:ll^t^ o^ ?-ra[ —<i^]-^«.^Tli-'-i'IS, P:«^1<-4T MWril^'ER^ . 1 WW W3W l..T}q' ?'S?TiW^^'"!":' yn^Tj ^"Ti'^||wnw 'eft". STT;-^-<3iP?fc7"^'^m^^sifOTsn^T "^ tt^ ^f^R^RTraders, Main Road, KeshkaljDistrict Bastar (CG), wherein it has beenheld that the time limit prescrjbed under Section 260-A of the Act to fileanappeal before the High C4urt is absolute and unextendable by courtunder Section 5 of the Limitaticjn Act., the application is rejected and theappea! is dismissed as barred fcjy law of limitation.Sd/-SA'-Dhu'endra MishraR.N. ChandrakarJudgeJudgeRaju

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.