Taxc/23/2006 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax,Bilaspur v. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal And Anr
High Court
20 Oct 2009 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cghccisdb
Parties
Taxc/23/2006 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax,Bilaspur v. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal And Anr
Date of order
20 Oct 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Taxc/23/2006 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax,Bilaspur v. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal And Anr, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
XI-HG—78
^-
•s^f -BTRriCT^ ^it^rrs, •{iRTCPp:'';,
<sn^s 'tra?? ('^R^'4)
d:f
o^
XI-HC—
^
e>tl)y<16, 'fsTCTlTiy^
K
M
I-
XI-
m
'Sf ';:?iraRTq,w (Si-yl<-l<!6, fetRT^,^^r^o...^..:...^J^O.tia^ ^aq? C^^srs^v w !<-(i<*'Bmfwftf ww&* fe^ ^T^R•asns'i^iwtiwTOiiW'Hita an^i-5-L'^sffimsn^iftiat tbe assessee was entitled |for higher late of depreciation @ 40%fhe tippers used by it.In view oftlie fuidixig of^ct recorded by the forums below, weof the.opiiuonfhatnosrtbstautialquestionof lawarisesadjudication of this appeal.There is no subatance iaj tbis appeal, fhe saine deserves to be_is accordiagly disimssed.—~Sd/-Sd,/-Dhirendra MishraR-N. ChandrakarJudgeJudge1+:^1,H;
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue