Case Law › High Court › Taxc/26/2010 Of Income Tax Officer Dhamt...

Taxc/26/2010 Of Income Tax Officer Dhamtari v. Amarchand Nahata Dhamtari

High Court 01 Apr 2009 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · cghccisdb

Parties

Date of order

01 Apr 2009

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Taxc/26/2010 Of Income Tax Officer Dhamtari v. Amarchand Nahata Dhamtari, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

WM? IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR (Ema; %./Glivis§an[Bench]@kevenue).r"$91.“'v.c.‘g.'.‘é“.VERSUS.'\RESPONDANTf?[Amarchand][ Nahata]ga.(Aesessee)C/o Theatre PrashantQ?6?Q6?Dhamtariff (C.G).,‘/ INCOME TAX APPEAL UNDER SECTION 260[--A]OF THE INCOME[—] LuvLI;‘un.x1VA,vuvuvvv“ ,,,, XI—HC-22 Divisian Eenm:aw“ $hr§ Qhmndm[Mishra][ $3]' ‘’mn,r $h'ré QLéaanwa JJ.i,4.gQQ9:-8hr} Rajeswék[Rag,] cmnsei for the appenant.ThematterisiistedondefauEt,aspaintedout videafficenote’gatad 17-5—2ao5[and][ 235—20631]U)LearnedcounseiforthaappeQiantpraysforandisgmnteé4weeks’ time[toremnve][ the][ defa]L31:‘s:heiftheti$fau§t§sm1:rmevedwithintheafaresaidperiod,apgeaighaEautomaiica§§yas?anddgsmis'sedwithcutreference mthe/[r//\]KBa‘wnSd/—S[dl][ ‘]MishraR.L. JhanwarD“KendraJudgeJudgeV[nwéfaa m‘wv‘‘/PS~J‘_%W97ba?W5“”9famAf§W4pc”?1W4G523]?s/rrPf[”49]’go/m4 wy’ram5'*:3MIPQ’ZP‘w[4Wwal?Jg!wgXw—Q5’ fW—I‘fwsqwp‘i‘lLjg/[£6][ z.)](W)[#Jl]édw”?mw$agawm lagueWWmwywwOxv‘LQ//%“C>(ramwzmme

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.