Case LawHigh Court › Taxc/36/2009 Of Durga Prasad Verma v. In...

Taxc/36/2009 Of Durga Prasad Verma v. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal

High Court 15 Jun 2009 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · cghccisdb
Parties
Taxc/36/2009 Of Durga Prasad Verma v. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal
Date of order
15 Jun 2009
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Taxc/36/2009 Of Durga Prasad Verma v. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
|HIGH COURTOFCHHARTTISGARHATBILASPUR|| |---|---| |Coram:-<br>Hcn’ble ShriDhirendtaMishm&<br>Hon’b!e Shz'iRN.GhandrakaaJ-J|| |TaxCase(PR! No.231512006|| |'Anpellant<br>:<br>Durga<br>Prasad<br>Verma,<br>Prop‘<br>Mls<br>Vsarma<br>Jeweuers,<br>Jawahar<br>Nagar,<br>’<br>Btmai, Distt.Durg (CG)|| |“i<br>I<br>Ver5g§|| |Resnondent<br>t<br>Insome<br>Tax<br>Appellate<br>Tribunal!<br>N13gpur<br>Bench,<br>Nagpur<br>(f :aharashtra)<br>,|| |Presem:<br>ShriS.R.J. Jaiswa<br>caunsel fortheappelta’nt.<br>L<br>ShriS‘Rajeshwar<br>0,counsel fortherespondent.<br>a|| |OaiOrder<br>(Passedo<br>15<br>ofJune,2009)|| |FerDhirendra Mishra,J:-|| |Thematter isIistedon d<br>ault.<br>Theappeal hasbeenfliedwitha|a| |delay of53daysandthereisno<br>pplication forcondonationofdeiayflled.|| |bytheappeHant.|| |(2}<br>Considering thefactthat<br>e appeal hasbeenmedwithadelayof<br>53dayswhichisbarredbyiimit<br>tionasalso thefactthatnoappiication<br>forcondonation ofdelayhasb<br>**limitation**<br>n fliedby theappeliant,theappealls<br>'<br>3,<br>dismlseeri a3barredby<br>'<br>V<br>,<br>“sal-<br>Chand‘a‘igr<br>SW‘<br>RN.<br>l<br>I<br>DhirendraMishra<br>r<br>Judge<br>'1';<br>Judge<br>1\/”||
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan