Case Law › High Court › Taxc/37/2008 Of Assistant Commissioner O...

Taxc/37/2008 Of Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Smt Roshan Ara

High Court 19 Aug 2010 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · cghccisdb

Parties

Date of order

19 Aug 2010

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Taxc/37/2008 Of Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Smt Roshan Ara, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed as not ms'ntainab'e.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

'-^ff""''ft./a^ \%.i °< sii1 1fi Tax Case dncome Tax ADDeaH No. 37 of 2008 INCOME TAX APPEAL U/S 260 A OF INCOME TAX ACT. 1961. DB: Hon'ble Shri Justice i.M. Hon'bte Shri Justice N. K. Agarwai. :Shri Rajeev Shrivastava with Shri Maiay Shrivastava,Advocates for the appellant.Advocates for the appellant. (Passed on 19th c3ay ofAugust, 2013) Per I.M. Quddusi, J. 1.2 . 3.Sahu This income tax appeal has been flled under Section 260 ofthe Income Tax Act, 1961, against the respondent for theassessment year 1991-92, wherein the total return of[the]assessee was Rs. 72,000!-.The appeal was filed on 23.07.2008 and as per instructlonNo. 5 of 2008 w.e.f. 15.05.2008, the monetary limit was Rs.4 Lakhs, therefore, in view of above circuiar, the appsal 'snot maintainable. The appeal is accordingly dismissed as not ms'ntainab'e. No order asto costs. costs.',Sdl—.\\3udge --Sd'-•f ^^

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.