Case Law › High Court › Taxc/40/2006 Of The Deputy Comm.of Incom...

Taxc/40/2006 Of The Deputy Comm.of Income Tax, Bhilai v. M/S P.s.steel Tubes Pvt.ltd., Bhilai

High Court 24 Nov 2010 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · cghccisdb

Parties

Date of order

24 Nov 2010

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Taxc/40/2006 Of The Deputy Comm.of Income Tax, Bhilai v. M/S P.s.steel Tubes Pvt.ltd., Bhilai, the High Court (2010) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

r 7S? •*ll<lld'4, g-al'M'Ko, fa(ctiy^<. .TQ£€,.LS^:.MI.&^S^.:,1 *11*<W( *W^» ^?38Q sn^n^r (1?f35i^) ani?fi (<-)i<t>'(I'K:^'>«(^t*>V*:^'>«(^t*>V*'>«(^t*>V**>V*'(I'K:^'>«(^t*>V*:^'>«(^t*>V*'>«(^t*>V**>V* ^>I<ffe<fh ifi*^ff ^f 'fe^ <|3|4$l<^?3ifipT3Ti^?r '(I'K:^'>«(^t*>V*:^'>«(^t*>V*'>«(^t*>V**>V*TOITW ^lftff afI^F <|3|4$l<^?3ifipT3Ti^?r'bie Shri R.N. ChandrakShri Rajeev Shrivastava,c|;unsel for the appellant.Shri Shashank Dubey,Advocate for respondent."With the consent of tlie parties, heard on I.A..4139/2006.Apptication is rejected.Learned counsel Tor tlle appellant prays for and isgranted four weeks' time to fil<certified copy of the impugnedorder.It is made clear that ifhe document is not filed withinthe aforesaid period, the appial shall stand dismiss withoutany further reference So theelnch.Sd/-Sd/-Dhirendra MishraR-N. ChandrakarJudgeJudge?rre^bi"^f^rgs°n^q',<Rqf^Tt^—i"FS/i47—2/2010—1,00,000. XI-HC—7S

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.