In Taxc/48/2010 Of Assit. Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Prem Stores, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
||a%wq$$($#§m§)|a%wq$$($#§m§)|||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|m Em W3<br>Hmanésvm||I|WWxTwW<br>ésaifaum||
||Divi§ionBench:<br>.<br>Hon’ble<br>m<br>$hri<br>DhirendraMishraa.<br>Hon-’bleShriR.N.ChandrakarJJ.<br>‘27-1||||
||{2010||||
||‘<br>V<br>Ms.<br>‘ V.ShradhaRao,<br>cou’nself0!<br>Thematterislisted<br>ondefault.|'theappellant.|||
||Learnedcounselfortheappelia<br>veeketoremovethedefault.<br>‘ilf<br>the<br>default<br>lsnot<br>removed<br>lppeal<br>shall<br>stand<br>dismissed<br>autom|1tpraysforand<br>isgrantedthree<br>ithin<br>the<br>aforesaid<br>period,<br>the<br>tically<br>without<br>reference<br>to<br>the|||
||lSdg-Amsl’m-A||||
||audge||SdL<br>R.N.Chandrakar||
||||Judge||
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue