Taxc/55/2011 Of Commisioner Of Income Tax v. Shri Mahavir Prasad Verma
High Court
04 Nov 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · cghccisdb
Parties
Taxc/55/2011 Of Commisioner Of Income Tax v. Shri Mahavir Prasad Verma
Date of order
04 Nov 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Taxc/55/2011 Of Commisioner Of Income Tax v. Shri Mahavir Prasad Verma, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
p',,'-.-^..g.s'^V/^-^n^^.i.^^i^si i-.-^U^IN THE HISH GOUEO: QF_JUHCMUBE M BIIASPUB (eHreig'TISQ^RH).a^^\±^•)NO.55 QF<^%^APPELIANT...,CONK1ISSIONER OF INCOME TAX »y:PyR,Bistrict I»>IPUR fCG).VEHSUS/^E3>ONQENT ..Shri MftAVIR PBASAD VE»A,A?fc.......Prop.bf /s Burga Jewellers,R.K.i „, £;.;i .&A^^np4^jawahar[Market,][ Camp][ 2,][ BHIIAI.]......f.sW^^.^--APPEM. UIB'ER SEGTION 260 A OFJHE XNGOME TAX.
HiGKCOURTOFCHHATTiSGARH AT BiLAS.PURTaxCase(PR.)No.1724 OF 2007'TM.WL.55/11AppetiantCommissioner of 'ncome Tax, Rai|^ ?7^ ^v ^ \ResDondentShri Mahavir Prasad Verma
iatisn n. Aani
Present:Shri Rajeev Shrivastava, Advocate for th^ appeilant.-.-'/-.•^Wi(Passed[on][ thls][ 04"']ith[ day][ of][ November,][ 2011)]The instant appeai was fited on /18.06.2007 without certified copyof the imouaned order and the seri,'ice certificate. as rsaulred.Sufficient ODDonuniti/ to make aood the dsfault has been affordedto the aDpeiiant for the last four years, tiil date nothing has beendone.Inview of foregoing,theappeaiisdismissed for wantofprosecution.,ff,s^..'..•••;s^-satishiig^tri :'-'R.S.SharmaSd/-Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.