Case Law › High Court › Taxc/63/2009 Of Commissioner Of Income T...

Taxc/63/2009 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri Harilal Ravilal Taank

High Court 03 Jul 2009 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cghccisdb
Parties
Taxc/63/2009 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri Harilal Ravilal Taank
Date of order
03 Jul 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Taxc/63/2009 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri Harilal Ravilal Taank, the High Court (2009) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Digitally signedby MEENAMAHROLIYAMEENAMAHROLIYADate:2025.02.0410:30:39+0530 W m / ‘ I N T H E H O N O U R A B L E H I G H C O U R T O F C H H A T T I S G A R H A T B u L A S P g R\m y i s m n E m m i k iT A X C A S E6 ?I e P g M‘ A P P § A L L A N T: -V C O M M l S S l O N E R [ I N C O M E]T A X R A : P U R ( C . G . ) V E R S U S l i g S P o N D E N T s ¢ ¢ § H R I[H A R ! L A L][ R A V I L A L]T A A N K , P R O P : M l s H R ,C O N S T R u c n o N R A v m R A MJ A I L R O A DR A I P U R ( c a ) ‘ \ g u /A P P E A LU / s 2 6 0 - A O F I N C O M E T A X A C T 1 9 6 1 X i — H f — 7 8 2 k 3 E.W m[w]Q W ~ 0 T 7 W / O ?)“ Q i ' z o e )“ Q i ' z o et w a tmW W H )‘ a a - m f ‘ a é h m ‘ f i w r i m$ a § m mD i v i s i o nB e n c h :Ho n ’ b l e S h r iD h i r e n d r aM i sh ‘.Ho n ’ b l eS h r i * - R . N . C h a n d r a k aJJ .3 - 7 - 2 0 0 9S h r iS . R a j e s h w a rR a o ,c o u n s e if o r t h ea p p e H a n t .L e a r n e dc o u n s e lf o rt h ea p p e u a n tf u r t h e rp r a y sf o rf o u r w e e k st i m et o r e m o v et h ed e f a u l t .O nt h ep r a y e ro ft h ei er n e dc o u n s e lf o rt h ea p p e l l a n t ,f i n a l l yf o u rw e e k s 't i m ei sa l l o w e dt or eo v et h ed e f a u l t ,f a i l i n gw h i c ht h i sa p p e a l/s h a l l s t a n dd i s m i s s e da u t o m a t i ‘a l l y w i t h o u tr e f e r e n c et o t h eC o u r t .\ ‘ .\l\ \ .S d / -lE x'5-4 i1‘ M I S H R AvS d l -.E‘'' . - R . N . C h a n d f a k a rlJ u d g e‘'ll- J u d g ell< <v 7 _.d . »E 3 8. m w ,, g n f m m A i w m g.gdwmgwag a w g gw e m w n a a w a
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan