In Taxc/65/2010 Of Commissioner Of Incometax v. M/S. Shakti Traders, the High Court (2010) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1 N T H E H O N ’ B L E H I G H C O U R [ J U D I C A T U R E][ F O R]C H H A T T I S G A R H A T B I L S P U RT a x C a s e N a g g/ 0 0 1 2 W
C 4(
w g ,E J V W EA P P E L L A N TC O M M I S S I O N E R O F6 ’ I N C O M E T A Xé / x ( R e v e n u e )R A I P U R._ _ % M ¢ W ‘ iI ‘W. V WV E R S U SR E S P O N D E N Tg / M / sS H A K T I T R A D E R SS A N T R A B A D I ,k ‘ f ( A s s e s ‘ S e ‘ e )D U R G)S /£ A P P E A L " U N D E R S E C T I O N2 6 0 - A O F T H EI N C O M E T A X A C T ,1 9 61
¢
awpw w m m k w
3 M /W# eW 2 0 9
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue