Taxc/66/2009 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri Balkrishan Agrawal
High Court
02 Sep 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · cghccisdb
Parties
Taxc/66/2009 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri Balkrishan Agrawal
Date of order
02 Sep 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Taxc/66/2009 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri Balkrishan Agrawal, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
W
r.
BEFORE [ HON’BLE][ HIGH][ COURT][ OF][ CHHATTISGARH]AT BILASPUR$3“,*Wwgmx CASE No££z§§z%"APPgLLANT/Oommissioner[of][ Income][ Tax,]Raipur‘\VERSUSmigBalkrishna[Agrawal,]RESPONDENT/Shri;24- Dungaji[Colony, Raipur.]I‘V”1.VAPPEAL[Uls.][ 260‘AI][ OF][ THE][ INCOME][ TAX][ ACT][ 1961]'E!
LY
z"-4/
-
DIVIslon Bench-‘"‘'rendra Pnr’k‘a ”m M..ra &Hon ble bhn R.N. bnandr‘lkar, JJ02!9.9/2009
Shri S. Rajeshwara Fvtao, counsel for the appenant.‘‘
The matter is Hsted oih-defau!t.
Learned coun$el for the appellant nrays for andis granted
four week’s time to remove :he default.
lt thatif the default is not removed within the le madevclear le madevclear
stimulated period. the anneal shall be liable to be dismissed Without
any further reference to the Bench.
SdLSdl--.DEERENEWU\B£EEH%ARN Chandrakaral'....Judgel‘g.Judge
/
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.