Case Law › High Court › Taxc/67/2010 Of Commissioner Of Income T...

Taxc/67/2010 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Vishnu Kumar Agrawal

High Court 22 Jan 2010 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · cghccisdb

Parties

Date of order

22 Jan 2010

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Taxc/67/2010 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Vishnu Kumar Agrawal, the High Court (2010) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HON’BLE HIGHCOUR OF JUDICATURE FORCHHATTISGARH AT BILSPURAPPELLANTMWCOMMISSIONER OFWwINCOMETAX(RevenugméRAIPURW[\p]VERSUSREs1$0NDENTVISHNU KUMAR AGRAWALC/O N.N. ISPAT (P) LTD.,(Assgsgee)NANDINI ROAD, BHILAI‘APPEAL UNDER SECTION 260-A OF THE‘ INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 i DIVISION BENCH:‘HON'BLE”R. JUSTICE m;HON'BLE[MR.][ JUSTICE][ R.N.][ CHAN]ARJ22.1.2010MrRajiv Shrivastava, Adv. fr The appellantThe maffer is listed on defIt.‘*[‘]Learned counsel for The opHart prays for andis gran-ted_'lhe‘rhis-fwo' weeks fime +0 mmovefauh, failing[which] appealdual! stand dismissed autama'rically wi'rhouf fur-flier reference[fa]fhe Bench.lsal—Sd/-J:DHIRENDRA MSI-RA‘l RN. ChandrakarJudgeJudgell W%%%d

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.