Case LawHigh Court › Taxila Gurukul Pvt. Ltd v. Asst. Commiss...

Taxila Gurukul Pvt. Ltd v. Asst. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Circle 25.1, New Delhi. & Ors

High Court 10 May 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Taxila Gurukul Pvt. Ltd v. Asst. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Circle 25.1, New Delhi. & Ors
Date of order
10 May 2024
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Taxila Gurukul Pvt. Ltd v. Asst. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Circle 25.1, New Delhi. & Ors, the High Court (2024) decided the matter.

Decision: 3.Consequently, the writ petition shall stand disposed of on the aforesaid terms.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~40 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5598/2024 & CM APPL. 23077/2024 (exemption) TAXILA GURUKUL PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rohit Tiwari, Ms. Shivani and Ms. Tanya, Advs. versus ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE 25.1, NEW DELHI. & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Sunil Agarwal, Sr.SC with Mr. Shivansh B. Pandya and Mr. Viplav Acharya, Jr.SCs along with Mr. Utkarsh Tiwari, Adv. along with Mr. Utkarsh Tiwari, Adv. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV O R D E R % 10.05.2024 1.Mr. Agarwal, learned counsel appearing for the respondents, on instructions apprises us that the issue of refund has been duly examined and the case of the petitioner has been accepted. 2.He submitted that effective release and relief shall be accorded within a period of three weeks from today. The statement so made is recorded and accepted. 3.Consequently, the writ petition shall stand disposed of on the aforesaid terms. YASHWANT VARMA, J. MAY 10, 2024/p PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan