Case LawHigh Court › Tc/1790/2008 Of Bhaskaran v. The Joint C...

Tc/1790/2008 Of Bhaskaran v. The Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax] 1/4

High Court 04 Dec 2019 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Tc/1790/2008 Of Bhaskaran v. The Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax] 1/4
Date of order
04 Dec 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Tc/1790/2008 Of Bhaskaran v. The Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax] 1/4, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: 3.Accordingly, the present Tax Appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as having become infructuous.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

Judgment in T.C.(A).No.1790 of 2008 dt.04.12.2019[V.Bhaskaran V. The Joint Commissioner of Income Tax]1/4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:04.12.2019 CORAM THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARIAND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR Tax Case (Appeal) No.1790 of 2008V.Bhaskaran... AppellantVs.The Joint Commissioner of Income Tax,Income Tax,Central Circle II(4),Chennai 600 034.... Respondent Tax Case Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai Bench 'C', dated 14.12.2007 in ITA(SS)A 90/MDS/2006. For Appellant : No appearance For Respondent: Mr.T.R.Senthil Kumar Senior Standing Counsel J U D G M E N T (Delivered by DR.VINEET KOTHARI,J.) The learned counsel for the Revenue submits that the present appeal arises from the order passed by the learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai on 14.12.2007 in ITA(SS)A 90/MDS/2006, http://www.judis.nic.in Judgment in T.C.(A).No.1790 of 2008 dt.04.12.2019[V.Bhaskaran V. The Joint Commissioner of Income Tax] 2/4 by which, the learned Tribunal was pleased to remand the case back to the Assessing Authority for giving fresh hearing to the Assessee and in pursuance of the order of the learned Tribunal, the Assessing Authority passed fresh assessing orders, which are again matter of fresh Tax Appeal filed by the Assessee viz., T.C.(A)No.1790 of 2008 [Shri.V.Bhaskaran V. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, Income Tax, Central Circle II (4), Chennai] and therefore, the present appeal filed by the Assessee against the aforesaid remand of the Tribunal has become infructuous. 2.Nobody appears on behalf of the appellant/Assessee to controvert this statement. 3.Accordingly, the present Tax Appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as having become infructuous. No order as to costs. (V.K.,J.) (R.S.K.,J.) 04.12.2019 Index : Yes/NoSpeaking Order : Yes/NoSglNote: Copy of this order may be sentto the appellant/Assessee. Judgment in T.C.(A).No.1790 of 2008 dt.04.12.2019[V.Bhaskaran V. The Joint Commissioner of Income Tax] 3/4 To The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai 'C' Bench, Chennai Judgment in T.C.(A).No.1790 of 2008 dt.04.12.2019[V.Bhaskaran V. The Joint Commissioner of Income Tax] 4/4 DR.VINEET KOTHARI, J.And R.SURESH KUMAR, J. SglT.C.(A)No.1790 of 2008 04.12.2019
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan