Tc/92/1998 Of The Commr Of Incometax v. Sree.annapoorna Gowrishankar
High Court
29 Oct 2002 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Tc/92/1998 Of The Commr Of Incometax v. Sree.annapoorna Gowrishankar
Date of order
29 Oct 2002
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Tc/92/1998 Of The Commr Of Incometax v. Sree.annapoorna Gowrishankar, the High Court (2002) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
?BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT%DATED: 11.03.2019*CORAMTHE HON-BLE MR.JUSTICE N.KIRUBAKARANandTHE HON-BLE MR.JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR+W.A.(MD) No.257 of 2019ANDC.M.P.(MD) No.2120 of 2019
K.Suresh Kumar... Appellant~vs~$1.The Superintendent of Police,Kanyakumari District.2.The Superintendent of Police,Thoothukudi District. ... Respondents
PRAYER: Appeal is filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, to set aside theorder dated 10.01.2018 in W.P.(MD) No.4515 of 2010 on the file of this Court.
!For Petitioner : Mr.K.Suresh Kumar
^For Respondents : Mr.A.Muthukaruppan, AGP
:JUDGMENT
[Judgment of the Court was made by N.KIRUBAKARAN, J.]
The learned counsel appearing for the appellant seeks leave of this Court towithdraw the writ appeal and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.In view of the representation and endorsement made by the learned counselappearing for the appellant, this writ appeal is dismissed as infructuous.No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also dismissed.
To
1.The Superintendent of Police,
Kanyakumari District.
2.The Superintendent of Police,Thoothukudi District.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue