Tca/1259/2010 Of The Commisioner Of Income Tax v. Meenakshi
High Court
09 Feb 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Tca/1259/2010 Of The Commisioner Of Income Tax v. Meenakshi
Date of order
09 Feb 2016
Assessment year(s)
2000-2001
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Tca/1259/2010 Of The Commisioner Of Income Tax v. Meenakshi, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In view of the said submissions made by the learnedcounsels appearing for the Appellant/Revenue, the present taxcase appeal stands dismissed, as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 09-02-2016
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDRENANDTHE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.VIMALA
Tax Case Appeal No.1259 of 2010
The Commissioner of Income Tax,Madurai. .. Appellant.-Versus-
V.Meenakshi .. Respondent.
Prayer: Appeal presented to the High Court against the order ofthe Income Tax Appellate Tribunal `B' Bench, Chennai, dated18.12.2009, in ITA No.2555/MDS/2007.
Against the Order of the Commissioner of the Income Tax(Appeals)-I, Madurai-2 Dated 21.06.2007 and made inITA.NO.0327/06-07 for the Assessment Year 2000-2001, against theOrder of the Income Tax Officer, Ward (II) (1), Madurai, Dated29.12.2006 and made in PAN/GIR.NO.AAXPM 1572 E for theAssessment Year 2000-2001.
For Appellant : Mr.T.Ravikumar Mr.J.Narayanaswamy Mr.T.R.Senthil Kumar Mr.M.Swaminathan
For Respondent : Mr.A.S.Sriraman
The learned counsels appearing for the Appellant/Revenue hadsubmitted that they may be permitted by this court to withdrawthe present tax case appeal, in view of the Circular No.21 of2015, issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes, Department ofRevenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, dated10.12.2015, as the tax effect relating to the matter is lessthan Rs.20,00,000/-.
2. The learned counsels had further submitted that libertymay be granted to the Appellant/Revenue to revive the tax caseappeal, if it is found that it had been withdrawn,https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
inadvertently, even though it falls under the exceptionsmentioned in paragraph 8 of the circular.
3. In view of the said submissions made by the learnedcounsels appearing for the Appellant/Revenue, the present taxcase appeal stands dismissed, as withdrawn. It is made clearthat the questions of law, which may arise for the decision ofthis Court, in the present tax case appeal, are left open to beconsidered and decided in appropriate cases, in accordance withlaw. It is also made clear that it would be open to theAppellant/Revenue to revive the tax case appeal, if it is foundthat it had been withdrawn, inadvertently, even though it fallsunder the exceptions mentioned in paragraph 8 of the Circular,within a period of twelve weeks from today. No costs.Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
csh Sd/- Asst.Registrar /true copy/Sub Asst. RegistrarTo1. The Commissioner of Income Tax, Madurai.2. The Income Tax Officer Ward II (1) Madurai. KR/14/3/16
Tax Case Appeal No.1259 of 2010
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.