Tca/152/2013 Of Commissioner Of Incometax v. M/S Great Lakes Institute At
High Court
08 Oct 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Tca/152/2013 Of Commissioner Of Incometax v. M/S Great Lakes Institute At
Date of order
08 Oct 2018
Assessment year(s)
2006-07
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Tca/152/2013 Of Commissioner Of Incometax v. M/S Great Lakes Institute At, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In the light of the above, the appeals are dismissed aswithdrawn and the substantial question of law framed is leftopen.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
In the High Court of Judicature at Madras
Dated : 08.10.2018
The Honourable Mr.Justice T.S.SIVAGNANAM
The Honourable Mrs.Justice V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN
Tax Case Appeal Nos.152 and 153 of 2013
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai. ...Appellant
M/s.Great Lakes Institute of Management, C/O Shri.R.Vijayaraghavan, advocate, Chennai-4....Respondent
APPEALS under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961against the common order dated 22.6.2012 in ITA Nos.931 and932/Mds/2012 on the file of the Income Tax Appellate TribunalMadras 'B' Bench respectively for the assessment years for 2006-07 and 2007-08, O/O the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-XIIChennai-34 dated 23/2/2012 made in ITA No.386/2009-2010 andagainst the Income Tax Officer,(OSD) (Exemptions)-III, Chennai-34 PAN No.3715-GAACCG-2885L Assessment Year 2006-07.
For Appellant : Mr.Karthik RanganathanFor Respondent : Mr.R.Venkata Narayanan for M/s.Subbaroya Aiyer Padmanabhan
(Judgment was delivered by T.S.SIVAGNANAM,J)
2. These appeals by the Revenue challenge the common orderpassed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, which decided theissue in favour of the assessee.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
3. The Revenue seeks to withdraw the appeals on account oflow tax effect in terms of Circular No.3 of 2018 dated 11.7.2018issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes.
4. In the light of the above, the appeals are dismissed aswithdrawn and the substantial question of law framed is leftopen. In the event, in each of the cases, the tax effect isabove the threshold limit fixed in the said circular, liberty isgranted to the Revenue to make a mention to this Court torestore the appeals to be heard and decided on merits. No costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS IX)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
1.The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras 'B' Bench. Madras 'B' Bench.
2.The Commissioner of Income Tax, (Appeals)-XII, Chennai-34. Chennai-34.
3.The Income Tax Officer,
(OSD) (Exemption)-III, Chennai.
+1cc to M/S.Subbaraya Aiyar Padmanabhan, Advocate Sr.69504
TCA.Nos.152 & 153 of 2013
rr[co]srg 28/11/2018
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.