Tca/260/2016 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri.k.sivakumar
High Court
15 Apr 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Tca/260/2016 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri.k.sivakumar
Date of order
15 Apr 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Tca/260/2016 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri.k.sivakumar, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: Whether on the facts and circumstances ofthe case, the Appellate Tribunal is correct innot appreciating that the new Search Assessmentprocedure u/s.
Decision: Therefore, these Tax Case Appeals are dismissed aswithdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated: 15.04.2016
The Hon'ble Mr.Justice V.RAMASUBRAMANIANAND The Hon'ble Mr.Justice M.V.MURALIDARAN
Commissioner of Income Tax,Central Circle, 108, Nungambakkam High Road, Chennai - 600 034. .. Appellant /Respondent
Tax Case Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income TaxAct, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal'C' Bench, Chennai dated 05.02.2015 in ITA No.1071, 1072, 1073 &1090/Mds/2014.
Order of the Court was made by V.Ramasubramanian, J)The Revenue has come up with the above appeals raising thefollowing substantial questions of law:
"1. Whether on the facts and circumstances ofthe case the Appellate Tribunal was right inquashing the assessment made u/s 153A, as thereare no seized materials to make fresh assessments?
2. Whether on the facts and circumstances ofthe case, the Appellate Tribunal is correct innot appreciating that the new Search Assessmentprocedure u/s. 153A of the Act wherrein the"total income" is to be determined whereas in theold search assessment procedure the "undisclosedincome" is to be determined?
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
3. Whether in the facts and circumstances ofthe case Tribunal is correct in holding that anyassessment u/s 153A can be done only based onincriminating material ignoring the non-abstanteClause which excludes reopening under section147?"
2. We have heard Mr.T.R.Senthilkumar, learned StandingCounsel appearing for the Department.
3. The Tax implication of these appeals is less than theceiling limit fixed by the Circular bearing No.21 of 2015 dated10.12.2015. Therefore, these Tax Case Appeals are dismissed aswithdrawn. The substantial questions of law are left unanswered.No costs.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar(AS) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar
To
1.The Chair Person, The Income Tax Appellate, Tribunal Chennai C Bench, Chennai.
2.The Commissioner of Income Tax Central II, Chennai 600 034.
3.The Deputy Commissioner of-Income Tax, Central Circle IV(1), Chennai-34.
TCA.Nos. 260 to 263 of 2016
vsn(CO)srg(26/04/2016)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.