Tca/334/2016 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.rapid Care Transcription
High Court
10 Oct 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Tca/334/2016 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.rapid Care Transcription
Date of order
10 Oct 2018
Assessment year(s)
2009-10
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Tca/334/2016 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.rapid Care Transcription, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
In the High Court of Judicature at Madras
Dated : 10.10.2018Coram :
The Honourable Mr.Justice T.S.SIVAGNANAM
and
The Honourable Mrs.Justice V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN
Tax Case Appeal No.334 of 2016
The Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai...Appellant/ Respondent VsM/s.Rapid Care Transcription Pvt.Ltd., Chennai-15...Respondent/AppellantAPPEAL under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961against the order dated 11.9.2015 in ITA No.1158/Mds/2014on the file of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Chennai'D' Bench for the assessment year 2009-10 against the orderdated:12.12.2013 is ITA.no.751/13-14(A)-V on the file ofthe commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals V) Chennai againstthe order dated 30.12.2011 passed by the AssistantCommissioner of Income Tax ,Company circle V (3) Chennai 34.
For Appellant : Mr.Karthik RanganathanFor Respondent : Mr.K.Jayachandran
Judgment was delivered by T.S.SIVAGNANAM,J
Heard the learned counsel for the appellant.
2. This appeal by the Revenue challenges the orderpassed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, which decidedthe issue in favour of the assessee.
3. The Revenue seeks to withdraw the appeal on accountof low tax effect in terms of Circular No.3 of 2018 dated11.7.2018 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes.
4. In the light of the above, the appeal is dismissedas withdrawn and the substantial questions of law framedare left open. In the event the tax effect is above the
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
threshold limit fixed in the said circular, liberty isgranted to the Revenue to make a mention to this Court torestore the appeal to be heard and decided on merits. Nocosts. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(Ccc)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
ToThe Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai 'D' Bench.
Copy to The section officer,VR Section,High courtMadras +1cc to Mr.Karthik Ranganathan , Advocate SR.No. 70652TCA.No.334 of 2016ASK(20/11/2018)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.