Case LawHigh Court › Tcmp/343/2004 Of Dy.commissiooner Of Inc...

Tcmp/343/2004 Of Dy.commissiooner Of Income Tax v. Mysore Leathers (P) Ltd

High Court 25 Nov 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Tcmp/343/2004 Of Dy.commissiooner Of Income Tax v. Mysore Leathers (P) Ltd
Date of order
25 Nov 2021
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Tcmp/343/2004 Of Dy.commissiooner Of Income Tax v. Mysore Leathers (P) Ltd, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

in TC(A).SR. No.106194 of 2002 R. MAHADEVAN, J.ANDMOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J. This petition is filed by the petitioner/Appellant seeking to condone the delay of 6 days in filing the above Tax case appeal. 2.This court ordered notice to the respondent through court as well as privately as early as on 24.08.2004. Again, by order dated 11.07.2011, the learned counsel for the petitioner /appellant was directed to serve notice on the respondent through privately. However, till date, notice has not been served on the respondent. No affidavit of service has also been filed. 3.However, today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, the learned standing counsel appearing for the petitioner / appellant submits that the tax effect in this case is less than the threshold limit and hence, the delay may be condoned and the appeal may be directed to be listed for withdrawal on account of low tax effect. 4.Taking note of the aforesaid submission made on the side of the petitioner / appellant, the delay is condoned and the petition is ordered accordingly. [R.M.D., J.] [M.S.Q., J.] 25.11.2021 Maya/Dhk Note: Registry is directed to number the appeal and post it for admission, after a week.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan