Tcp Limited, Tcp Sapthagiri Bhavan, New v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, Aayakar Bhavan, 121, Uthamar Gandhi Salai, Chennai
High Court
19 Jul 2019 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Tcp Limited, Tcp Sapthagiri Bhavan, New v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, Aayakar Bhavan, 121, Uthamar Gandhi Salai, Chennai
Date of order
19 Jul 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Tcp Limited, Tcp Sapthagiri Bhavan, New v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, Aayakar Bhavan, 121, Uthamar Gandhi Salai, Chennai, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADRAS
DATED: 19.07.2019
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESHW.P.No.7546 of 2012
andM.P.No.1 of 2012
TCP Limited,TCP Sapthagiri Bhavan,New No.4, Old No.10,Karpagambal Nagar,Mylapore, Chennai - 4
...PetitionerVs
1. The Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Aayakar Bhavan, 121, Uthamar Gandhi Salai, Chennai - 600034.
2. The Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, Company Range III, 121, Uthamar Gandhi Salai, Chennai - 600034....Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of theConstitution of India, praying to issue a writ of CertiorarifiedMandamus, calling for the records comprised in the impugnedletter dated 29.02.2012 bearing No.AAACT3615K/Co.Range-III/2009-10 issued by the second respondent and all consequentialproceedings thereto and quash the same and consequently directthe second respondent to dispose of the Rectification Petitionfiled by the petitioner company in accordance with law.
For Petitioner : Ms.Tanushree Arvind (Enrl.No.Ms.4116/2018) for Mr.R.Parthasarathy
For Respondents: Mr.J.Narayana Swamy, SSC
O R D E R
Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, thelearned representing counsel for the petitioner submitted thatthe relief sought for in the present writ petition has becomeinfructuous. She has also made an endorsement to that effect.
2. Recording the submission and the endorsement made by thelearned representing counsel for the petitioner, the writpetition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently,connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Sd/-Assistant Registrar(CCC)//True copy//Sub Assistant RegistrarhvkTo
1. The Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Aayakar Bhavan, 121, Uthamar Gandhi Salai, Chennai - 600034.
2. The Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, Company Range III, 121, Uthamar Gandhi Salai, Chennai - 600034.+1cc to Mr.J.Narayana Swamy, Advocate SR.No.62008
EV(CO)GMY(28/08/2019)
W.P.No.7546 of 2012andM.P.No.1 of 2012
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue