In Tds v. Citi Bank N.a, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1491 OF 2005
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) 507 IF 2005
The Commissioner of Income Tax .... Appellant
TDS
Vs.
Citi Bank N.A. .... Respondent
Mr. A.D. Kango for Appellant.
Mr. A.K.Jasani for respondent.
CORAM : F.I. REBELLO, &
. J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ
DATE : 14TH AUGUST, 2007
P.C.
. The delay is of 269 days and we have
considered the affidavit in support of the motion.
Considering the delay in the Law Department, in our
opinion, the cause shown would amount to sufficient
cause. In the light of that, motion made absolute
in terms of Prayer Clause (a). Office to register
the appeal.
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.